Starfield review | A jack of all trades, but a master of none.

This video review of Starfield provides an honest assessment of the game, acknowledging its strengths in creating an immersive universe and story but criticising its mediocre gameplay mechanics, graphics, and AI behavior. Despite its flaws, the reviewer believes that Starfield is worth experiencing for space enthusiasts, with potential for improvement through future mods and DLCs.

This video review of Starfield provides an honest and unbiased assessment of the game’s strengths and weaknesses. The reviewer clarifies that they are not sponsored and purchased the game themselves. They spent over 70 hours playing and found that while Starfield tries to excel in various areas, it falls short and can be considered a “jack of all trades, but a master of none.” The gameplay is criticized for its mediocre gunplay, lack of seamless transitioning between space and atmospheric flight, and the absence of space walking. The graphics are generally good but not exceptional, and the game relies heavily on loading screens.

The reviewer acknowledges that Starfield is heavily inspired by various sci-fi universes such as Star Wars, Battlestar Galactica, Firefly, Star Trek, Stargate, and Alien. While the universe created in Starfield is immersive and beautiful, the overall gameplay experience does not meet the expectations set by other open-world space simulation games. However, if players are looking for an immersive story-driven RPG set in space, they may find enjoyment in Starfield. The story, while not as captivating as Red Dead Redemption 2, successfully combines elements from different sci-fi franchises to create a unique and untold tale.

The review then delves into the specific pros and cons of the game. The gameplay mechanics are criticized for feeling like a port from console to PC, with issues such as lack of ground vehicles, clunky gunplay, tedious outpost building, and excessive loading screens. However, the exploration aspect receives praise, as the boundaries within the planets and moons are not restrictive. The graphics are generally appealing, but NPCs’ faces and facial animations are notably poor. The storytelling is deemed weak, with lackluster dialogue and NPCs lacking compelling backstories. However, the overall story and universe of Starfield are considered intriguing and immersive.

The AI behavior is criticized for poor pathfinding and interactions, causing immersion-breaking moments. The RPG mechanics are acknowledged as solid, with satisfying progression and perks, but they lack innovation and feel similar to those found in the Fallout series. The sound design and music receive positive remarks, with impressive engine sounds and ambient noises, although some gun sounds are lacking. The soundtrack is praised for complementing the gameplay without overusing the main theme.

In conclusion, the reviewer suggests that despite the game’s obvious flaws, Starfield is worth experiencing for true space enthusiasts. They express excitement for future mods and DLCs that could enhance the game’s potential and replayability. The reviewer laments the lack of multiplayer functionality and expresses a desire for improvements and optimizations. They award Starfield an overall score of 6.5 out of 10 grumplings, citing the game’s potential and the sentimental value it holds for space exploration enthusiasts.